What does the term 'concurrent jurisdiction' refer to?

The term 'concurrent jurisdiction' refers to the situation where two or more different courts or jurisdictions have the authority to hear and decide on the same legal matter. This concept enables multiple legal entities to exercise their legal powers over a particular case, allowing parties involved the possibility to bring their case in any of those courts that have jurisdiction. This can be particularly relevant in cases involving both state and federal law, where either level of government can take legal action based on the same facts or issues.

For example, if a crime violates both state law and federal law, both state and federal courts can exercise jurisdiction concurrently over the case. This can help ensure that justice is served in a way that is appropriate to the circumstances, as different jurisdictions may have varying legal frameworks and remedies available.

The other options represent different legal concepts. One describes a sequence of jurisdiction (consecutively resolving cases), which isn’t relevant to concurrent jurisdiction. Another refers to a singular court's authority over different offenses, which is not about concurrent jurisdictions. Lastly, the mention of overlapping cases between juvenile and adult courts refers to a specific procedural framework but does not capture the broader definition of concurrent jurisdiction.